Screener
ASMU vs HIBS
Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- ASMU costs 0.09% less per year.
- HIBS is significantly larger than ASMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASMU covers europe markets; HIBS covers north america.
- ASMU follows a leveraged strategy; HIBS uses inverse.
- HIBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASMU | HIBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 1.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $19M |
| Since | 2026 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 7.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -80.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -62.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -52.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 67.54% |
| Max drawdown | -34.78% | -99.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASMU and HIBS
Explore further