Screener
ASMU vs TNA
Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- ASMU costs 0.08% less per year.
- TNA is significantly larger than ASMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASMU covers europe markets; TNA covers north america.
- TNA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASMU | TNA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 1.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2026 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +130.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +30.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 57.15% |
| Max drawdown | -34.78% | -88.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASMU and TNA
Explore further