Screener
BAB vs ICSH
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.20% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than BAB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAB follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAB | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $7.3B |
| Since | 2009 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.05% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.3% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.14 | 3.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.94% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -27.80% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAB and ICSH
Explore further