Screener
BAB vs RVNU
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF vs Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
Key differences
- RVNU costs 0.13% less per year.
- BAB is significantly larger than RVNU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAB | RVNU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $136M |
| Since | 2009 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.05% | 3.49% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.3% | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.14 | 0.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.94% | 5.31% |
| Max drawdown | -27.80% | -23.51% |
Similar to BAB and RVNU
Explore further