Screener
BAB vs TFLO
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF vs iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
Key differences
- TFLO costs 0.13% less per year.
- TFLO is significantly larger than BAB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAB | TFLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $6.7B |
| Since | 2009 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.05% | 3.99% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.3% | +3.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.14 | 3.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.94% | 0.28% |
| Max drawdown | -27.80% | -0.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAB and TFLO
Explore further