Screener
BAFE vs FDRS
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.05% less per year.
- BAFE is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAFE is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BAFE follows a active selection strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAFE | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $77M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.29% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.12% | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.37% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAFE and FDRS
Explore further