Screener
BAGY vs BFAP
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF vs FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April
Key differences
- BAGY costs 0.25% less per year.
- BAGY is significantly larger than BFAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAGY follows a option income strategy; BFAP uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAGY | BFAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $2M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 49.10% | 22.70% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | -28.5% | -19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.28% | 21.08% |
| Max drawdown | -47.52% | -31.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAGY and BFAP
Explore further