Screener
BAGY vs BITU
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF vs Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
Key differences
- BAGY costs 0.33% less per year.
- BITU is significantly larger than BAGY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAGY is classified as alternative, while BITU is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- BAGY follows a option income strategy; BITU uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAGY | BITU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $513M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 49.10% | 19.70% |
| Asset class | alternative | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -28.5% | -66.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.28% | 86.08% |
| Max drawdown | -47.52% | -77.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAGY and BITU
Explore further