Screener
BAGY vs LFGY
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF vs YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
Key differences
- BAGY costs 0.37% less per year.
- LFGY is significantly larger than BAGY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAGY | LFGY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.02% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $125M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 49.10% | 90.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -28.5% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.28% | 37.17% |
| Max drawdown | -47.52% | -35.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAGY and LFGY
Explore further