Screener
BAGY vs RYLD
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- RYLD costs 0.05% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than BAGY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAGY | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 49.10% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -28.5% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.28% | 10.84% |
| Max drawdown | -47.52% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAGY and RYLD
Explore further