Screener
BAI vs IXN
iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF vs iShares Global Tech ETF
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.16% less per year.
- BAI follows a active selection strategy; IXN uses index tracking.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAI | IXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $7.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +91.7% | +63.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +35.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +22.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 32.18% | 21.62% |
| Max drawdown | -34.09% | -36.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAI and IXN
Explore further