Screener
BAIV vs GSY
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
Key differences
- GSY costs 0.38% less per year.
- GSY is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while GSY is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; GSY covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; GSY uses index tracking.
- GSY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | GSY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2026 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.38% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 3.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.40% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -5.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and GSY
Explore further