Screener
BAIV vs IJS
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Key differences
- IJS costs 0.42% less per year.
- IJS is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV covers global markets; IJS covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; IJS uses index tracking.
- IJS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | IJS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $7.9B |
| Since | 2026 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +41.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.48% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -47.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and IJS
Explore further