Screener
BAIV vs INTL
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- BAIV costs 0.24% less per year.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while INTL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; INTL uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $222M |
| Since | 2026 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.26% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and INTL
Explore further