Screener
BAIV vs IWS
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- IWS costs 0.37% less per year.
- IWS is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV covers global markets; IWS covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; IWS uses index tracking.
- IWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | IWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $14.9B |
| Since | 2026 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.33% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -43.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and IWS
Explore further