Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BAIV vs MANI

Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Man Active Income ETF

BAIV

Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF

Brown Advisory

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$95M

MANI

Man Active Income ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

Key differences

  • BAIV is classified as equity, while MANI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • BAIV covers global markets; MANI covers emerging markets.
  • BAIV follows a active selection strategy; MANI uses long short.

Side-by-side comparison

BAIVMANI
Annual cost (TER)0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$95M
Since2026
Dividend yield
Asset classequityalternative
Regionglobalemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionlong short
CAGR 1YN/AN/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y
Max drawdown-11.41%-0.73%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BAIV and MANI