Screener
BAIV vs PGHY
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Invesco Global ex-US High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PGHY costs 0.25% less per year.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while PGHY is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; PGHY uses index tracking.
- PGHY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | PGHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $212M |
| Since | 2026 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 7.09% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.98% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -20.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and PGHY
Explore further