Screener
BAIV vs SCHJ
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCHJ costs 0.57% less per year.
- SCHJ is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while SCHJ is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; SCHJ covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; SCHJ uses index tracking.
- SCHJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | SCHJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $759M |
| Since | 2026 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.88% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -13.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and SCHJ
Explore further