Screener
BAIV vs VTWO
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTWO costs 0.54% less per year.
- VTWO is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV covers global markets; VTWO covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; VTWO uses index tracking.
- VTWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $16.6B |
| Since | 2026 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -41.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and VTWO
Explore further