Screener
BALI vs ENHU
iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHU costs 0.13% less per year.
- BALI is significantly larger than ENHU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BALI follows a index tracking strategy; ENHU uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BALI | ENHU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $9M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 8.44% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.08% | — |
| Max drawdown | -16.65% | -8.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BALI and ENHU
Explore further