Screener
BALQ vs GPIQ
iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF vs Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
Key differences
- GPIQ costs 0.06% less per year.
- GPIQ is significantly larger than BALQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BALQ is classified as fixed income, while GPIQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BALQ follows a index tracking strategy; GPIQ uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| BALQ | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $3.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.56% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +39.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.51% |
| Max drawdown | -11.79% | -21.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BALQ and GPIQ
Explore further