Screener
BALQ vs TEQI
iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF vs T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- BALQ costs 0.19% less per year.
- TEQI is significantly larger than BALQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BALQ is classified as fixed income, while TEQI is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BALQ follows a index tracking strategy; TEQI uses active selection.
- TEQI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BALQ | TEQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $403M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.57% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.61% |
| Max drawdown | -11.79% | -17.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BALQ and TEQI
Explore further