Screener
BAMG vs IJK
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF vs iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
Key differences
Both BAMG and IJK are equity ETFs. BAMG charges 0.89% a year and IJK 0.17%. The main difference: BAMG follows a active selection strategy; IJK uses index tracking.
- BAMG follows a active selection strategy; IJK uses index tracking.
- IJK costs 0.72% less per year.
- IJK is much larger than BAMG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IJK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAMG | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $139M | $11.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.71% | 17.23% |
| Max drawdown | -21.00% | -39.25% |
Similar to BAMG and IJK
Explore further