Screener
BAMG vs IMCG
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both BAMG and IMCG are equity ETFs. BAMG charges 0.89% a year and IMCG 0.06%. The main difference: BAMG follows a active selection strategy; IMCG uses index tracking.
- BAMG follows a active selection strategy; IMCG uses index tracking.
- IMCG costs 0.83% less per year.
- IMCG is much larger than BAMG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAMG | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $139M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2023 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.71% | 15.99% |
| Max drawdown | -21.00% | -35.08% |
Similar to BAMG and IMCG
Explore further