Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BAMV vs BAMA

Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs Brookstone Active ETF

BAMV

Brookstone Value Stock ETF

Annual cost

0.91%

Fund size

$102M

BAMA

Brookstone Active ETF

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$53M

Key differences

BAMV is an equity ETF, while BAMA is a mixed asset ETF. BAMV charges 0.91% a year and BAMA 0.99%.

  • BAMV is an equity fund, while BAMA is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • BAMV costs 0.08% less per year.

Side-by-side comparison

BAMVBAMA
Annual cost (TER)0.91%0.99%
Fund size (AUM)$102M$53M
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.27%1.31%
Asset classequitymixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+15.1%+17.3%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y11.87%9.51%
Max drawdown-14.56%-12.27%

Similar to BAMV and BAMA