Screener
BAMV vs FVAL
Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs Fidelity Value Factor ETF
Key differences
Both BAMV and FVAL are equity ETFs. BAMV charges 0.91% a year and FVAL 0.15%. The main difference: BAMV follows a active selection strategy; FVAL uses index tracking.
- BAMV follows a active selection strategy; FVAL uses index tracking.
- FVAL costs 0.76% less per year.
- FVAL is much larger than BAMV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAMV | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.91% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $102M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.1% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.87% | 11.79% |
| Max drawdown | -14.56% | -37.26% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.