Screener
BASG vs CGCV
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGCV costs 0.28% less per year.
- CGCV is significantly larger than BASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BASG covers global markets; CGCV covers north america.
- BASG follows a active selection strategy; CGCV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASG | CGCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $467M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.81% |
| Max drawdown | -19.30% | -13.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASG and CGCV
Explore further