Screener
BASG vs FNDA
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Key differences
- FNDA costs 0.36% less per year.
- FNDA is significantly larger than BASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BASG covers global markets; FNDA covers north america.
- BASG follows a active selection strategy; FNDA uses index tracking.
- FNDA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASG | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $467M | $10.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +34.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.28% |
| Max drawdown | -19.30% | -44.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASG and FNDA
Explore further