Screener
BASG vs GSSC
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSSC costs 0.41% less per year.
- BASG covers global markets; GSSC covers north america.
- BASG follows a active selection strategy; GSSC uses index tracking.
- GSSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASG | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $467M | $952M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +35.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.69% |
| Max drawdown | -19.30% | -41.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASG and GSSC
Explore further