Screener
BASG vs ILCG
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
Key differences
- ILCG costs 0.57% less per year.
- ILCG is significantly larger than BASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BASG covers global markets; ILCG covers north america.
- BASG follows a active selection strategy; ILCG uses index tracking.
- ILCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASG | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $467M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -19.30% | -35.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASG and ILCG
Explore further