Screener
BASG vs ISCV
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- ISCV costs 0.55% less per year.
- BASG covers global markets; ISCV covers north america.
- BASG follows a active selection strategy; ISCV uses index tracking.
- ISCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASG | ISCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $467M | $651M |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.50% |
| Max drawdown | -19.30% | -51.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASG and ISCV
Explore further