Screener
BASG vs NBGX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Neuberger Growth ETF
Key differences
- NBGX costs 0.17% less per year.
- BASG is significantly larger than NBGX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BASG is classified as equity, while NBGX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BASG covers global markets; NBGX covers north america.
- BASG follows a active selection strategy; NBGX uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASG | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $467M | $14M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.27% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.27% |
| Max drawdown | -19.30% | -21.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASG and NBGX
Explore further