Screener
BASG vs SCHK
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Schwab 1000 ETF
Key differences
- SCHK costs 0.58% less per year.
- SCHK is significantly larger than BASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BASG covers global markets; SCHK covers north america.
- BASG follows a active selection strategy; SCHK uses index tracking.
- SCHK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASG | SCHK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $467M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.30% |
| Max drawdown | -19.30% | -34.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASG and SCHK
Explore further