Screener
BASG vs SCHX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHX costs 0.58% less per year.
- SCHX is significantly larger than BASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BASG covers global markets; SCHX covers north america.
- BASG follows a active selection strategy; SCHX uses index tracking.
- SCHX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASG | SCHX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $467M | $68.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.15% |
| Max drawdown | -19.30% | -34.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASG and SCHX
Explore further