Screener
BASV vs PFUT
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
Key differences
- PFUT costs 0.07% less per year.
- BASV is significantly larger than PFUT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BASV follows a active selection strategy; PFUT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASV | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.71% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $359M | $5M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.25% |
| Max drawdown | -9.43% | -44.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASV and PFUT
Explore further