Screener
BASV vs SCHA
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHA costs 0.67% less per year.
- SCHA is significantly larger than BASV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BASV follows a active selection strategy; SCHA uses index tracking.
- SCHA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASV | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.71% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $359M | $22.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.16% |
| Max drawdown | -9.43% | -42.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASV and SCHA
Explore further