Screener
BBAX vs JEMA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF vs JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
Both BBAX and JEMA are equity ETFs. BBAX charges 0.19% a year and JEMA 0.33%. The main difference: BBAX follows a index tracking strategy; JEMA uses active selection.
- BBAX follows a index tracking strategy; JEMA uses active selection.
- BBAX covers the Asia-Pacific region; JEMA covers emerging markets.
- BBAX costs 0.14% less per year.
- BBAX is much larger than JEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, JEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBAX | JEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.4B | $1.7B |
| Since | 2018 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.57% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +48.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.3% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.74% | 21.29% |
| Max drawdown | -39.64% | -39.50% |
Similar to BBAX and JEMA
Explore further