Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BBEM vs MEMX

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

BBEM

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$853M

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$50M

Key differences

Both BBEM and MEMX are equity ETFs. BBEM charges 0.15% a year and MEMX 0.79%. The main difference: BBEM follows a index tracking strategy; MEMX uses active selection.

  • BBEM follows a index tracking strategy; MEMX uses active selection.
  • BBEM costs 0.64% less per year.
  • BBEM is much larger than MEMX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

BBEMMEMX
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$853M$50M
Since20232023
Dividend yield2.72%1.55%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+40.3%+56.3%
CAGR 3Y+20.3%+24.5%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.921.12
Volatility 1Y20.57%22.75%
Max drawdown-17.42%-19.27%

Similar to BBEM and MEMX