Screener
BBH vs CGIC
VanEck Biotech ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
Both BBH and CGIC are equity ETFs. BBH charges 0.35% a year and CGIC 0.54%. The main difference: BBH follows a index tracking strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
- BBH follows a index tracking strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
- BBH covers North America; CGIC covers global markets excluding the US.
- BBH costs 0.19% less per year.
- CGIC is much larger than BBH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- BBH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBH | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $367M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2011 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.9% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.41% | 15.96% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -13.10% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.