Screener
BBH vs ITM
VanEck Biotech ETF vs VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
Key differences
- ITM costs 0.17% less per year.
- ITM is significantly larger than BBH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BBH is classified as equity, while ITM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, BBH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBH | ITM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $365M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2011 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 2.92% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.8% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.82% | 2.84% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -24.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BBH and ITM
Explore further