Screener
BBH vs IWB
VanEck Biotech ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
Both BBH and IWB are equity ETFs. BBH charges 0.35% a year and IWB 0.15%. The main difference: IWB costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWB costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than BBH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBH | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $367M | $48.9B |
| Since | 2011 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.9% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.6% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.41% | 12.39% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -34.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.