Screener
BBH vs TRUF
VanEck Biotech ETF vs Vaneck Financials TruSector ETF
Key differences
- TRUF costs 0.25% less per year.
- BBH is significantly larger than TRUF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BBH follows a index tracking strategy; TRUF uses active selection.
- BBH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBH | TRUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $365M | $0.5M |
| Since | 2011 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.82% | — |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -3.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BBH and TRUF
Explore further