Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BBLU vs EEMA

Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

BBLU

Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$436M

EEMA

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

Annual cost

0.49%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

Both BBLU and EEMA are equity ETFs. BBLU charges 0.15% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: BBLU follows a active selection strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.

  • BBLU follows a active selection strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.
  • BBLU covers North America; EEMA covers emerging markets.
  • BBLU costs 0.34% less per year.
  • EEMA is much larger than BBLU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BBLU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BBLUEEMA
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.49%
Fund size (AUM)$436M$1.3B
Since19972012
Dividend yield1.13%1.18%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+26.7%+43.8%
CAGR 3Y+23.3%+22.6%
CAGR 5YN/A+5.9%
Sharpe 3Y1.320.94
Volatility 1Y11.42%21.37%
Max drawdown-17.20%-44.18%

Similar to BBLU and EEMA