Screener
BBLU vs FNDF
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Key differences
Both BBLU and FNDF are equity ETFs. BBLU charges 0.15% a year and FNDF 0.25%. The main difference: BBLU follows a active selection strategy; FNDF uses index tracking.
- BBLU follows a active selection strategy; FNDF uses index tracking.
- BBLU covers North America; FNDF covers global markets excluding the US.
- BBLU costs 0.10% less per year.
- FNDF is much larger than BBLU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- BBLU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBLU | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $24.6B |
| Since | 1997 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.13% | 2.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.3% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.42% | 15.55% |
| Max drawdown | -17.20% | -40.14% |
Similar to BBLU and FNDF
Explore further