Screener
BCEM vs CGIC
Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
Both BCEM and CGIC are equity ETFs. BCEM charges 0.80% a year and CGIC 0.54%. The main difference: BCEM follows a index tracking strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
- BCEM follows a index tracking strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
- BCEM covers emerging markets; CGIC covers global markets excluding the US.
- CGIC costs 0.26% less per year.
- CGIC is much larger than BCEM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCEM | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.60% |
| Max drawdown | -8.79% | -13.10% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.