Screener
BCFN vs AGG
Baron Financials ETF vs iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- AGG costs 0.77% less per year.
- AGG is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCFN is classified as equity, while AGG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- AGG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | AGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $135.4B |
| Since | 2019 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.95% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.90% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -18.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and AGG
Explore further