Screener
BCFN vs CGUS
Baron Financials ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.47% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCFN follows a index tracking strategy; CGUS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -22.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and CGUS
Explore further