Screener
BCFN vs CPLS
Baron Financials ETF vs AB Core Plus Bond ETF
Key differences
- CPLS costs 0.50% less per year.
- CPLS is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCFN is classified as equity, while CPLS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BCFN follows a index tracking strategy; CPLS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | CPLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $216M |
| Since | 2019 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.65% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.91% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -4.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and CPLS
Explore further