Screener
BCFN vs IAK
Baron Financials ETF vs iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
Key differences
- IAK costs 0.42% less per year.
- IAK is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IAK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | IAK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $371M |
| Since | 2019 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +2.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.76% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -44.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and IAK
Explore further