Screener
BCFN vs IG
Baron Financials ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.61% less per year.
- IG is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCFN is classified as equity, while IG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BCFN follows a index tracking strategy; IG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | IG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $179M |
| Since | 2019 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 5.06% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.81% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -23.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and IG
Explore further